WELCOME TO THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DOMESTIC TERRORIST “EXPOSE” SPOTLIGHT
WELCOME TO THE SITE THAT MAY SAVE ALL OF US!!
AS THE WEBSITE IDENTIFIES WHAT COULD BE THE NUMBER THREAT TO OUR LIBERTY AND JUSTICE… AS WHEN OUR GOVERNMENTS AND/OR COURTS (local, state or federal) ARE INFECTED BY THE MORALLY BANKRUPT, THEY (OUR PUBLIC EMPLOYEES) BECOME PART OF THE DOMESTIC TERRORISTS!
MY NAME IS PATRICK DORAN. 1185TH Willow Drive, CA. 951-264-7103
FIRST OFF, I THANK YOU FOR YOUR VISIT; AND AS THE INITIATOR OF THIS SITE I WANT TO MAKE IT 100% CLEAR THAT I AM THE PERSON WHO IS TAKING FULL RESPONSABILITY FOR THE ACCUSATIONS AND THE SUPPORTING EVIDENCE THAT WILL BE PRESENTED AGAINST THOSE I IDENTIFY HEREIN BY NAME AND DESCRIBE AS DOMESTIC TERRORISTS!!
AND AT THIS POINT… PLEASE ALLOW ME TO TRY TO RELIEVE ANY ANXIOUS FEELINGS YOU MAY HAVE HAD WHEN YOU WERE FIRST LOGGING ON? … AS THIS SITE IS NOT RELATED TO THE KIND OF TERRORISTS THAT ATTACKED THE U.S. ON 9-11; UNFORTUNATLY (and I say this with absolute sincerity) THE TYPE I REFER TO HERE ARE ACTUALLY MORE OF AN “OVERALL” THREAT TO OUR WAY OF LIFE; AS IT IS OUR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS THEY CAN VIOLATE….. AND YES, THOSE VERY SAME LIBERTY AND JUSTICE RIGHTS REFERED TO IN THE PLEDGE OF ALLIGIANCE, WHICH COUNTLESS THOUSANDS WHO FOUGHT, BLED AND DIED TO INSURE KEEPING IN MIND, WITHOUT THOSE ALL OTHER RIGHTS COMBINED ARE OF ZERO VALUE!!
SO, IT IS WITH 100% CERTAINTY THAT I SAY, AFTER REVIEWING THE SITE CONTENT AND RELATED LINK(S) …. MUCH MORE THAN 50% OF YOU WILL (FROM YOUR OWN PERSONAL EXPERIENCE) RECOGNIZE THE “DOMESTIC TERRORIST TYPE” OF WHO I WRITE… AND (UNFORTUNATLY) ARE AMONG US FROM BORDER TO BORDER AND COAST TO COAST; WITH SUPPORT FOR THAT BEING, AMONG THOSE NAMED BELOW, ARE SUPERIOR, AND COURT OF APPEAL JUDGES, THE RIVERSIDE CALIFORNIA GRAND JURY SYSTEM, CITY OF NORCO ATTORNEY, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS, MANAGER(S), DEPARTMENT HEADS AND STAFF…ALL OF WHICH OPERATE WITH VIRTUAL IMPUNITY….
AND IT IS NOT EASY TO ACCEPT, BUT THE FACT THAT THEY EXIST HERE IN RIVERSIDE AND NORCO, THERE IS NO DOUBT YOU HAVE THE SAME INFECTIOUS VIRUS TYPES IN YOUR AREA WHICH PUTS THEM AS THE SHEEP DOG’S, AND THE PEOPLE JUST THE HERDED SHEEP!
NOW, BEFORE YOU GO GETTING YOUR NICKERS IN A KNOT OVER THAT LAST LINE? THERE IS ANOTHER CATEGORY CHOICE OF WHICH THE MAJORITY OF US “CLAIM” AND SHOULD FIT; AND THAT IS, AMERICAN CITIZENS WITH THEIR “BOYS” HOOKED ON, WHO WILL STAND UP AND FIGHT ANY VIOLATER OF OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS; INCLUDING THE LIKE OF WHICH I IDENTIFY BELOW!! AND AS MY WAY OF “PUTTING MY FACE AND VOICE WHERE MY WRITTEN WORDS ARE, I AM INCLUDING A SHORT VIDEO THAT WILL NOT ONLY DO THAT, BUT I WILL ALSO TRY TO GIVE AS MUCH INFORMATION AND FACTS REGARDING EACH!!
THE LIST INCLUDES BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING.
JUDGE, VICTOR MICELI:
RETIRED, BUT STILL ACTIVE AROUND THE RIVERSIDE SUPERIOR COURT. AND YES, IT’S THE SAME DWARF/NAPOLEON COMPLEXED ONE WHO GOT HIS NAME ON THE RIVERSIDE CA. LAW LIBRARY. WOW!
JUDGE MICHAEL KAISER:
ALSO RETIRED (NO LIBRARY YET, BUT SAME MORAL BANKRUPTCY VALUES)
NOTE; IF YOU READ THE S.C.D.T. BOOK ATTACHED? WHEN I REFER TO SEPT. 09 / 03 AS THE DATE WHEN I REALIZED THERE WOULD BE NO JUSTICE FOR THE PAT DORAN FAMILY….. WELL, IT WAS ON THAT DATE THAT JUDGE KAISER F’ED US (THE DORANS) OUT OF OUR LAWFUL RIGHTS.. VIEW THE VIDEO… HEAR THE CHARGES, AND VIEW THE DOCUMENTS!!
LOW LIFE WITH A ROBE!!
JUDGE CRAIG RIEMER
(LITTLE DOUBT SCHIZOPHRENIC, NO DOUBT NEEDS ANGER MANAGEMENT)
WAIT TILL YOU SEE HOW THIS BIRD RULED FOR A CONVICTED & DISBARRED CA. ATTORNEY, WHO STOLE OUR $ AS HE HAD TO OTHER CLIENTS! SEE HIS VIDEO!
COURT SERVICES ARM OF SHERIFF’S, EXECUTES WARRANTLESS ARREST & HOME INVASION 1-11-07. 1009 4TH St. SAID JUDGES WERE AFRAID (OF WHAT, MY 140 Lb, OR MY EXPOSE BOOK?
NORCO CITY ATTORNEY JOHN HARPER (POSSIBLE 3HR. VIDEO NEEDED FOR THIS BIRD, AS IT ALSO INCLUDES A COPY OF HIS 1997 PERJURED TESTIMONY TO The Grand Jury)
NORCO CITY (CONTRACT) COUNSEL/REPRESENTATIVE Att. MARIA AARVIG.
CORONA CA. ATTORNEY MICHAEL J. LA CILENTO (A.O.N. UNSURE RE: Att. JAMES MADDEN)
AND USING THE LIST OF PRESENT (P) AND FORMER (F) CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND/OR EMPLOYEES ARE AS FOLLOWS. COUNCIL; BARBARA CARMICHAEL (F). KATHY AZEVEDO (P)
COUNCILMAN FRANK HALL (P). HARVEY SULLIVAN, HERB HIGGINS AND TERRY WRIGHT(F).
CITY MANAGER(S):GEORGE LAMBERT (F). GERRY JOHNSON (F). AND JEFF ALLRED (P)
CITY ENGINEER’S: BOB WOODINGS AND JOE SCHENK (F) PLANNING DIR: JAMES DANIELS (F)
BUILDING OFFICIALS: JAMES THOMAS AND MARK BERG (F) CODE DEPT: CARLOS LEVARIO.
BUILDING INSPECTOR: CRAIG WELSH (P).
HEAD OF BUILDING & SAFETY AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPT: BILL THOMPSON.
THERE ARE OTHER PRESENT AND FORMER CITY OF NORCO EMPLOYEES WHO AT THIS POINT I AM UNSURE AS HOW TO CATAGORIZE….. AS I AM UNSURE IF THEY ARE/WERE WILLING SUPPORTERS OF SOME OF THOSE NAMED ABOVE; OR JUST EMPLOYEES DOING AS THEIR SUPERIORS WANTED (DESPITE THEIR “SUPPORT” BEING UNLAWFUL) IN ORDER TO KEEP THEIR JOB? AMONG THOSE IS FORMER COUNCILMAN/MAYOR CHRIS SORENSEN, PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. TERRY PIORKOWSKI, PLANNING DEPT. STAFF, JIM MULDER (F) AND STEVEN KING (P), COUNTER TECHNICIAN LINDA TACKETT (P) AND ROSE MATTHEWS (P).
AND LAST (AS OF NOW) I’M NAMING THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, AS SUPPORTING (PASSIVELY OR OTHERWISE) FOR ITS FAILURE TO RESPOND WHEN I CONTACTED THEM REGARDING A PROPERTY I OWN THAT HAS AN ADJOINING PROPERTY THAT IS “OFFICIALLY” ADDRESSED AS 1187 2ND STREET (A PUBLIC STREET) NORCO. A.P.M. # 125140023. THAT PROPERTY IS OWNED BY A MR. SIMON ROMERO; WHO ALONG WITH HIMSELF, HIS FAMILY AND INVITEES ARE UNLAWFULLY USING WILLOW DRIVE (A PRIVATE ROAD) AND MY PROPERTY TO ACCESS HIS PROPERTY.
MR. ROMERO ACKNOWLEDGED THAT HE DID NOT HAVE THE LEGAL RIGHT TO ACCESS HIS RECENTLY PURCHASED PROPERTY OTHER THAN VIA 2ND STREET, AND WE SOON AFTER AGREED THAT HE WOULD PURCHASE THE ACCESS RIGHT (FROM ME) AND AS PART HE WOULD BE ALLOWED ACCESS USE VIA WILLOW DR. UNTIL HE RESOLVED THE ISSUE WITH THE TITLE Co, THE REAL ESTATE Co. AND THE PREVIOUS OWNER; ALL OF WHO WERE AWARE, AS I HAD PREVIOUSLY NOTIFIED EACH BY CERTIFIED MAIL PRIOR TO MR. ROMERO’S PURCHASSE. ALSO, I GAVE A COPY OF THOSE LETTERS TO MR. ROMERO.
AS PART OF MR. ROMERO’S AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE THE WILLOW DRIVE ACCESS (WHICH INCLUDED PROPERTY TO THE CENTER LINE OF THE WILLOW DR. CUL-DE-SAC ‘BULB’) I ALSO AGREED TO INCLUDE A TRIANGLE SHAPED PIECE OF MY PROPERTY WHICH WAS AT THE SOUTH END OF MY 1185 WILLOW DR LOT AND SOON AFTER MR. ROMERO AND I REMOVED THE NORTH/SOUTH RUNNING FENCE BETWEEN OUR PROPERTIES, AND I THEN INSTALLED AN EAST/WEST DIRECTION ONE THAT EXTENDED OUR EXISTING EAST/WEST PPROPERTY LINE (ALONG THE NORTHERLY E/W LINE OF THE TRIANGLE PIECE).
IN RESPONSE TO MY “WHATS HAPPENING” INQUIREY IN SEPTEMBER 07? MR. ROMERO ADVISED ME THAT HE WAS NOT TAKING ANY LEGAL/FRAUD ACTION AGAINST THE TITLE Co, FORMER OWNER OR THE R.E. Co; AND ADDED THAT HE HAD FAMILY IN THE RIVERSIDE Co. DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE, AND THEY ASSURED HIM THAT THEY WOULD MAKE SURE THAT I WOULD BE PREVENTED FROM STOPPING HIS USE OF MY PROPERTY OR WILLOW DR.
IN A PHONE CALL, FOLLOWED UP BY A LETTER TO THE D.A’S OFFICE IN FEB-09 SEEKING AN OFFICE VISIT WITH A SENIOR D.A. TO ADVISE THEM FACE TO FACE (AS I HAD BY PHONE) THAT IT WAS MY INTENT TO FILE A BREACH OF CONTRACT LAWSUIT AGAINST MR ROMERO
AND THAT I WANTED THEM TO IDENTIFY MR. ROMERO’S D.A FAMILY MEMBERS AND PUT THEM ON NOTICE THAT I WILL HAVE ZERO QUAMS ADDING THEM TO A SUIT, IF THEY ATTEMPT TO UNLAWFULLY INTERFER WITH MY LEGAL OR CIVIL RIGHTS….. AND SINCE THEY DIDN’T PERMIT ME AN OPPORTUNITY TO ADVISE THEM IN A FACE TO FACE …… BY THIS, THEY AND THE WORLD HAVE IT NOW!
UP DATE FEB. 2010
DUE TO CONTINUING VIOLATIONS BY THE COURT, CITY OF NORCO COUNCIL, MANAGER AND PARTICULAR STAFF MEMBERS, I (as an Irish Citizen too) HAVE ASKED The Irish Consulate in S.F. Ca. TO INTERVENE AGAINST THEIR UNLAWFUL CONDUCT.
A COPY OF THAT LETTER TO THE CONSULATE IS ATTACHED AS PART OF THIS,
THERE IS ALSO A VIDEO I MADE Feb. 2010 THAT EXPLAINS POINTS OF THE LETTER.
READ THE LETTER FIRST; SO THE VIDEO (AT THE END) WILL BE IN CONTEXT.
PADDY DORAN. PATRICK DORAN (For Patrick and Drina Doran)
1009 4TH STREET
NORCO, CA. 92860 951-2647103 Jan. 29, 2010
CONSULATE GENERAL OF IRELAND
100 PINE STREET, SUITE 3350
SAN FRANCISCO. CALIFORNIA 94111
Re: PROTECTION ASSISTANCE REQUEST…. AGAINST THE CALIFORNIA SUPERIOR COURT AND DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE IN RIVERSIDE CA.
DEAR CONSULATE GENERAL;
FIRST, ALLOW ME TO ADVISE, I AM MAKING THIS REQUEST IN THE NAME OF MYSELF AND DRINA….. BOTH OF WHO ARE IRISH CITIZENS AND AT THIS PRESENT TIME ALSO HOLD AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP.
Basically, my request would be asking the Consulate to officially contact the office(s) of The Ca. Governor, The Ca. Attorney General, The Ca. Commission on Judicial Performance and The Presiding Judge of The Ca. Superior Court, in Riverside Ca.
AT THIS POINT IT COULD BE FAIR IF YOU WERE THINKING; WELL WHY DON’T YOU TRY AN AMERICAN GOVERNMENT AGENCY FIRST? Please see such request to President Bush, Gov. Schwarzenegger and the Irish P.M. (I received no answer).
And although our difficulties with this system here began in 1992, it was only after my filing a complaint with The Commission on Judicial Performance against Judge Victor Miceli for his unlawful conduct (which was) contacting our Norco City Attorney, and ordering him to “officially” send knowingly false testimony in a case I filed against an abutting property owner who was trespassing over our property; which then justified Miceli finding against us and giving rights over our property (rights that are to this very day unlawful under Ca. Subdivision Law) and also gave the “defendant” a $25,000.00 judgment, which turned into $35,000.00 that we had to pay Feb 6, 1966 or our property was being sold at public auction; and this despite a filed appeal was pending in the Court.
Adding insult to injury, that “ruling” was made in favor of the defendant who was himself a (convicted for 25yrs) Bank Robber who bragged about being in THE WITNESS PROTECTION PROGRAM. This fact was expressed at the Feb 04, 1997 case# EO12947 court of appeal hearing by attorney Ferrigno; with the request that the defendant be required to place the $35,000.00 into a court escrow account until the case had a final decision made as The Bank Robber was at that time trying to sell his property, as if he sold it and moved… we would be unable to find out where he moved to…
And further, Ferrigno also advised them that there was an active governmental (Grand Jury) investigation into the conduct of Judge Miceli, The City of Norco Attorney John Harper, City Council and Staff Members, which was relevant to this case before them!
WELL, THAT STATEMENT MUST HAVE BEEN SUCH A SHOCK TO THE THREE JUDGE PANEL WHO WERE HEARING THE CASE, AS THEY DID NOT UTTER A WORD OF RESPONSE, INSTEAD THEY TURNED THEIR HEAD’S TO GLANCE AT EACH OTHER, GOT UP, WALKED OFF THE BENCH AND INTO CHAMBERS.
Note: Court of Appeal hearings are audio/video rec.; so the last 4 lines could be verified!!
All court and court of appeal filings/documents (including trial transcript) and the Dec. 18, 1996 notice from The Commission on Judicial Performance stating that they had taken “corrective” action against Judge Miceli..are in my possession and can be supplied should you feel the need …. Some “corrective” action that must have been…as only two months later, The Appeal Court having no real choice sent the case back to be re-heard.
BUT, JUST WHAT COURTROOM DO YOU THINK THEY SENT IT TO???
DOUBTLESS YOU GUESSED IT WAS MICELI’S…… AND DESPITE HAVING JUST HAD HIS DONKEY FRIED BY THE COMMISSION…HE WOULD NOT RECUSE HIMSELF…. IN FACT HE CONTACTED MY ATTORNEY AND “ADVISED” HIM TO NOT SHOW UP IN COURT FOR TRIAL OR HE WOULD RUIN HIS LAW CAREER IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY. ANY DISBELIEVERS HERE??
ASK ME FOR THE DOCUMENTED COURT RECORD EVIDENCE, WHICH SHOWS; MY ATTORNEY ANTHONY FERRIGNO DID AS MICELI TOLD HIM.
I NEVER DID SEE Mr.FERRIGNO (OR MY $15K. RETAINER) AGAIN, WHICH LEFT ME WITHOUT FUNDS OR ATTORNEY AND DESPITE THE OVER $100K. COST TO GET IT THROUGH THE APPEAL, I WAS FORCED TO ALLOW THE CASE TO BE DISMISSED (OR FACE MICELI ALONE) So…so much more on him!
And although the above does not seem possible to have happened in The United States,
it only got worse and worse in case after case via the same ‘violate the Doran’s rights’ by this Riverside Court system. And in Sept. 2003 it got so bad, we decided that the only way left for us to try to achieve justice was through putting it into some kind of a book.
That “book thing” was attempted (which you can see and download FREE at www.scdtspotlight.com ) however, the effort was stymied when publishers expressed their unwillingness to publish it because it exposes Judges, Attorneys, Riverside Superior and Court of Appeal, and our Grand Jury; which caused fear of lawsuits that could cause them bankruptcy before even making it to trial! NOT FAIR… BUT FACT!
And so, rather than try to cite full facts of case after case here, I’ll limit it to a few with “headlines and or datelines”; the most recent few of which cause our immediate need for this protection request.
This request also includes a promise that I have and can supply irrefutable evidence that will support the statements I make within the total of this document.
Dateline Friday April 14, 1995:
Legal representative for the City of Norco Maria Aarvig whose office is in Riverside Ca. filed a “Declaration in support of Summary Judgment” in superior court Riverside, in the name of Norco Planning Director, James Daniels…. However, when I confronted Daniels on Monday April 17,1995 he stated that he had neither made, seen or signed said document, and added that he had never seen, and would not know Ms Aarvig if she were to walk through his door on that (approximately 9 a.m.) date!
That Document was used in court as evidence by Attorney Aarvig, who on a later date (with Mr. Daniels in deposition) had him swear that he had signed said document prior to it being filed April 14 1995…. Mr. Daniels expressed to me (as he had also had done to former Norco Mayor Ron Wildfong) that he had been “put under pressure to sign a copy of that declaration after April 17, 1995.
On the above I will take a Polygraph at any time for anyone… PERIOD!
Note: At a later date while on a speaker phone Mr. Daniels, with City Manager G. Johnson and Councilman Bill Vaughan present, he/they confirmed to me that it was Mr. James Thomas (the Norco Building Official) who made “The Declaration”, adding that it was done without Daniels permission. Given that admission, Daniels committed Perjury in Deposition. But why, to what end, and at whose direction???
Bad as the above 1995 period was in which we had been trying since 92 to get the court to order the city to remove an unlawful ban (which had been placed by The City Council) on permits being issued to us; gave Drina reason to believe that the ten and above a day Tylenol quality headaches she was having was just stress related to the building permit ban we were under; and it was not until late December when her left eye ruptured and the emergency room diagnosis’s that followed showed that the headaches had been caused by eye pressure because she had Glaucoma (and coincidental as one may believe it was, by the end of Jan. 1996 The City of Norco officially recognized that the excuse that had been used for the 1992 permit ban had been invalid and that plan checking would now continue (on a fast track) from where they were in 1992; and further promised to reduce the permit fees by $10,000.00 (Those Promises made, Promises not kept. Doc’s on hand).
And most unfortunately for Drina, despite 11 in Hospital Operations and too many to remember in office procedures (which included 4 pump implants and a cornea transplant) she has lost over 90% sight in her left eye; but ongoing care has the right one doing o.k.
Note: We never took legal action against the city, but out of a video I made for/to Mr. Daniels which a Norco resident viewed and advised me Dec. 09, that my assumptions expressed on it that Glaucoma was in Drina’s d.n.a. which made her venerable was correct; but it was the continued stress that was most likely responsible; and if the stress was unjustifiably imposed by the city, should they have been held accountable???
April 13, 1996: Norco City Council approved my Subdivision Tentative Parcel Map application; but was given just 30 days instead of the Ca. State Subdivision Law’s minimum of two years to comply with Conditions of Approval (Never was approved).
Dateline Oct, 18 1995:
City of Norco Attorney John Harper revealed in Open Council that he had complied with a phone called “demand” from Judge Miceli, ordering him take back and change his letter of confirmation that the testimony given by Norco Planning Director James Daniels and former Norco Mayor Ron Wildfong was truthful and accurate; in that the Bank Robber identified in page one above had acquired no right to cross through my property, resulting from my subdivision hearing on Parcel Map # 24637 on Dec. 6, 1989.
Harper complied with that unlawful Miceli order in a letter dated Nov. 17, 1992
As a note: Although the date for final arguments and submittals had been on Oct, 16. yet Harper dated his (second) letter with the Nov. 17, 1992 date on it……and brainless as that was, the other Jackass Miceli put it in the official court file! Brainless or Arrogance?
The official audio recording of The Council hearing and the Nov. 17 letter are here for u.
Dateline Dec. 1995: Based on Harpers Oct. 18, on record “Miceli made me do it” confession; Councilman Sorensen & Manager Johnson. Offered $ if I don’t sue Norco!
I made a complaint to the Commission on Judicial Performance about Judge Miceli; which resulted in the Dec. 18, 1996 letter (copy attached) also to The Riverside Grand Jury about Miceli, Attorney Harper, Norco Council Members and other City Staff cohorts; which resulted in an official investigation that I testified before (at least 7 times).
Unfortunately, that ”investigation” was ended in June 1997 without action being recommended for prosecution of any of those I identified in my investigation request.
HOWEVER, THE PERPETRATORS COVERUP WAS EXPOSED JUNE 13, 2000 WHEN A WHISTLE-BLOWER FROM INSIDE THE GRAND JURY GAVE ME THE ORIGINAL (SECRET AND CONFIDENTIAL) AUDIO TAPES THAT WERE MADE OF THOSE WHO WERE CALLED TO TESTIFY (with two tapes being of myself among them) AND THOUGH THERE WERE ONES FOR HARPER, DANIELS, COUNCILMAN VAUGHAN, COUNCILWOMAN CARMICHAEL AND HER FRIEND BETSY LEGERE; BUT, THERE WAS NONE OF MICELI…
AND THINKING ABOUT IT, JUST WHY SHOULD THERE BE ONE OF HIM? ESPECIALLY FACTORING IN THAT HE WAS THE MAIN PERPETRATOR…. AND HE WAS THE ONLY ONE WITH “THE JUICE” TO GET A GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION SHUT DOWN (A MINOR FEAT I’M SURE COMPARED TO GETTING HIS NAME PLACED OVER THE RIVERSIDE LAW LIBRARY).
SHORTLY AFTER RECEIVING THE TAPE RECORDINGS I (after expressing what was on them) OFFERED COPIES TO A “NEW” CITY COUNCILMAN NAMED HARVEY SULLIVAN; SULLIVAN SAID THAT “IF WHAT I WAS SAYING WAS ACTUALLY ON THE TAPES? HE WOULD GET AN INVESTIGATION DONE; ADDING, THAT HE DID NOT CARE WHO WENT TO PRISON AS A RESULT!!
No doubt he was referring to Harper, Council, Staff and Mrs. Legere. As lying to the Grand Jury is a Prison time offence! And on tape all but Councilman Vaughan lied!
AND AFTER GIVING (N* B*LLS) HARVEY A COPY OF THE TAPES…. YES, AN INVESTIGATION WAS DONE… UNFORTUNATLY IT WAS ONE THAT WAS TRYING TO DISCOVER WHO THE “WHISTLE-BLOWER” WAS…. Sick City.
The tapes and all related doc’s are here for you….. Please please ask for them!!
Dateline Jan. 30, 2001: City of Norco Attorney John Harper and Code Enforcement Officer Carlos Leverio filed with the court for a search warrant of our 1205 and 1195 Willow Dr. With an attached declaration (that they signed) saying that they had tried to contact me but had been unsuccessful and did not know how to contact me otherwise
Proof that they intentionally lied to the court is based on the facts that were revealed in the grand jury tapes (given to me in June 2000) resulted in Attorney James De Aguilera filing a lawsuit on our behalf in August 2000; AND WE HAD ALREADY HAD TWO COURT HEARING’S, WITH THE NEXT HEARING DATE ALREADY ON CALANDER FOR JAN/31/2001, WHICH WAS ONE DAY AFTER HARPER GOT A WARRANT TO SEARCH OUR PROPERTIES….. AND AT THAT JAN/31 HEARING Harper DID NOT SAY ONE WORD TO De Aguilera ABOUT THE WARRANTS WHICH WERE EXECUTED JUST FIVE DAYS LATER ON FEB. 5; AND AS A RESULT OF THAT SEARCH, Harper GOT ANOTHER WARRANT FOR 1195 WILLOW DR (Citing multiple kitchen units) WHICH RESULTED IN THE CITY RAIDING OUR HOME FOUR DAYS LATER (Feb 9). WITH CAMERAS AND LIGHTS ON, THEY (members of the Fire Dept, Building Inspector, Code Enforcement, District Attorneys Office, Camera and Lighting man) WENT THROUGH THE HOUSE ROOM BY ROOM AND CLOSET BY CLOSET, AND ALTHOUGH THERE WERE NO “EXTRA” KITCHENS, THEY STILL FILED A 32 COUNT CHARGE; that took 2 yrs, 26 court dates, a night in jail; where I was assaulted by one of the four intake guards.
My rejection of a Plea-deal offered by Harper (which must have tweaked his ass, as within an hour of going in to pick the Jury), he had (before the court even opened) showed up early and had the charges dismissed. DIRTY SPINELESS B*^#*+D!
F.Y.I. the house was new (only 5 months old)….
Dateline Jan. 11, 2007:
Court services arm of the Riverside County Sheriff’s Dept. (while we were out of the house) went through and searched our home, and when Drina came to and looked through the front door, she saw them leaving through the back one; Drina then stayed on the outside and walked around the house to confront them. She did and asked them what they were doing, and if they had a search warrant? They did not respond to her questions (which she repeated over and over) instead she was restrained and had her cell phone taken from her…. AND RATHER THAN GO ON HERE… I’LL JUST SAY THAT THERE HAD BEEN NO SEARCH OR ARREST WARRANTS…. AND WE MADE A VIDEO REENACTMENT THE NEXT DAY AND USED IT AS PART OF OUR COMPLAINT TO THE SHERIFF’S DEPT.
The result of that complaint is attached, and as you will see they admitted that it had been unlawful entry, and unlawful arrest. And despite this admission on paper we could not find an attorney to take them to account. Their answers were either a direct no….. or, we defend, not prosecute the Judges and Sheriff’s Department.
The expressed reason given for them having been sent to our home in the first place, was THE (unnamed) JUDGES FELT THAT I WAS THREATENING THEM!!
What, because I’m writing a book exposing the moral bankruptcy in their courts??
The Jan. 12, 2007 reenactment video and all related doc’s are yours for the asking.
Although there are 5 pages above this one, and it would take over 500 to really tell what has been inflicted on us here in Norco, but if you look at the s.c.d.t Southern Calif. Domestic Terrorists spotlight web site (And, we are not selling anything there)
you will see that it has been going on for over 18 years, and our immediate need is to get a court to intervene and stop the unlawful actions that they are imposing on us related to a house we have been trying to get finished (for over 3 yrs) that is also the only property we have remaining that we have (little as it is) some equity in. And I need to be able to get this resolved without having to put my freedom into the hands of those Criminal B*****d Judges in the Riverside courts… which is the only court I have access to; UNLESS I GET A CHANGE OF VENUE. And the possibility of acquiring it without Consulate or Media attention, equals the proverbial snowball
So whatever you “may” have just glanced over in the previous pages, I’LL THANK YOU TO PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING AS CAREFULLY AS YOU CAN…
AS THE UNLAWFUL ACTIONS AGAINST US BY THIS CITY AND COURT COULD ONLY BE DESCRIBED AS SICK, AND THE BOX THEY HAVE US IN NOW, REQUIRES A REMEDY WE JUST CAN’T PROVIDE BY OURSELVES…
Dateline Jan. 5, 2005: After yrs of intentional delay by The City of Norco Building permit issuing system we were finally issued a permit, with a total cost of over $53,000.00 which includes, Plans for both Building and Fire Sprinklers, engineering calculations, School, Park and other assorted fees plus the actual “building” permit fee as was required to build the house addressed as 1185 Willow Drive, Norco.
Also, please keep in mind and factor in, THAT A PERMIT IS ACTUALLY A CONTRACT WITH THE CITY; THAT ‘FOR A FEE’ THEY WILL PROVIDE BUILDING/CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION(S) UNDER THE PLANS AS APPROVED, CODES AND TERMS EXISTING AT THE TIME THE PERMIT IS ISSUED; WHICH ALSO INCLUDES BY LAW, ALL CONTRACT, LOCAL, STATE, FEDERAL OR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT’S LAW, THAT TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER NORCO MUNICIPAL (REAL OR IMAGINED) CODE’S
Although I/we started our permit pursuit inquiries in 2003 (regarding set-back minimums required for the building from the property line). We were stymied when a city employee told me that she was advised to tell me that I was to receive no services from the City of Norco unless Attorney John Harper approved them first!!
That statement was recorded by me on July 19, 2003 (with the employees consent). A free of charge copy is available to all who just ask for it……..
I WILL TRY NOW TO COMPRESS AND FINISH THE REMAINDER OF THIS WITH A PROMISE; ALL FILL-IN FACTS in Doc’s & Videos are available to all!
Dateline Dec. 2006:
By this date the building/construction of 1185 Willow Dr. was over 50% completed with all required inspections having been done and approved; but by the spring of 2007 THE CITY WOULD NOT RESPOND TO INSPECTION REQUESTS.
DESPITE LETTERS AND D.V.D’s GIVEN INTO THE CITY DEMANDING INSPECTIONS, AND/OR AN EXPLANATION AS TO WHY NOT? (And though each and every letter and/or d.v.d. was hand delivered… with a “stamped received by the city of Norco” copy returned to me) THE CITY OF NORCO DID NOT RESPOND IN ANY WAY TO ANY OF THOSE LETTER OR D.V.D. REQUEST’S
By late July 2009 (31 months since the last inspection) I was advised by the Norco Post Office Manager that it requires an official notice from the city regarding any new or changed addresses in the city, before the P.O. will deliver to that location.
Well, given that the property where ‘The Bank Robber’ used to live had gotten that property address changed from 1187 Second St. (a Public St.) and changed it to reflect 1210 Willow Dr. (a Private Subdivision St. which requires them to cross my property to get their mail; making it against Ca. and Norco’s Subdivision law) The facts and detail account of this has been going on for over a decade So for now I’ll just say that Miceli and Harper are front and center, and are the reason the city will not give details, or under what law they used to justify the (100% Unlawful) change!
THE DETAILS OF THIS IS JUST BEYOND BELIEF, but it is an issue that needs to be resolved (by a court if need be) in order to have the property clear/saleable..
Anyway (factoring in the above), after speaking to the P.O. manager I went to the city with the intent of using the Freedom of Information act to ask for a date that the city changed the address; and as a result I got to speak to a Beth Groves who had just become the new Norco City Manager. And after assuring me that I would get the info I was looking for, she then said that was aware that we had been denied inspections on our building, and asked if I/we would be willing to “allow” the inspections start up again, citing that there was a new Building Official working for the city, so there would be no existing animosities between us ? WE ACCEPTED IMMEDIATELY, and within two weeks we had met the Building Official and had an inspection done by him; and as the building was then 95+% finished, the Video and Photo record I had made of/during the construction (and had supplied to the city when they were made over the last two years) were accepted and agreed to be used to verify that the construction had been done as per the plans WITHOUT THE NEED TO REMOVE THE DRYWALL FROM THE WALLS OR CEILINGS!!
Where the above paragraph would suggest that the inspection situation was resolved….. It was up to the third inspection….. around which time the Building Official and the new city manager Beth Groves apparently became infected with same virus that the city attorney, council and many staff members have had since the early nineties; resulting in a change of the previous agreement to use the Videos and Photos….. WITH THE NEW ARBITRARY DECISION BY Ms GROVES..
THAT WE WILL COMPLY WITH BUILDING OFFICIAL’S DEMAND TO REMOVE WALL AND CEILING PORTIONS….. AND IN ADDITION… ANY AND ALL OTHER ISSUES OUTSTANDING REGARDING THE CITIES VIOLATIONS OF OUR PROPERTY RIGHTS WOULD BE FROZEN UNTIL WE COMPLIED WITH THE (NOW INFECTED) B. OFFICIAL’S DEMAND’S.
Note: In August 09 at my first meeting with The Bld. Official, Bld Dept. Head Mr. Bill Thompson was also present, at which time he expressed that prior Building Official Mark Berg had (in about July 2008) received, hid and then destroyed the fire sprinkler plans that had been sent to the Bld. Dept. after having had been just approved for the house; which (by the way) had been submitted for plan checking on Jan. 17, 2007 (no typo 2007, and those plans too, had ‘gone lost’ until Oct. 2007).
Since Mr. Thompson was Building Dept. Head in July 2008 and was fully aware that we could not apply for a fire sprinkler inspection until the plans were approved WHY WOULD/DID HE WAIT FOR MORE THAN A YEAR TO TELL ME???
Just one of many questions Mr. Thompson has refused to answer BUT, HE WILL!!
AND AS LOST PLANS WERE JUST NOTED ABOVE: Full plans and engineered structural calculations that were submitted in 1990 for a one story, and another for a two story at 1205 & 1195 Willow Dr. YES, THE CITY “LOOOST” THEM TOO!
Well I know that this could go on and on with me describing instance after instance, (as much as 8 even 10 times more than above, but it has also taken over 18 years)
So I will TRY to “bottom line” this…
GIVEN THAT THE CITY HAS NO FEAR OF THE RIVERSIDE Ct,
I will obviously need to take legal action to get the house finalized with a C. of O. in order to get Gas and Electric service turned on before being occupied.
Another immediate need we for getting this resolved is, as the “construction Insu”
Expired; we can’t buy homeowners until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued….
WOULD IT BE FAIR TO SAY… THEY ARE HOLDING US HOSTAGE???
And although we can’t occupy it, we still have to pay the construction loan (which now is @ 10%) and cost us over $50,000.00 in interest just since Dec. 2006 when they (unlawfully) stopped inspecting
Now, the above alone could have a reasonable person suggesting that it could be prudent to just do (whether it is lawful or not) as the city is demanding…….
WELL, FOR OTHERS THAT “MAY” BE A WAY TO GO? But for this 67 yr old, having come from Ireland in 1960; and that with my $2.00, my ‘townhalls’, and my Dignity intact. And on this date can state that IN THE LAST 49 YEARS, I never took one penny from unemployment, workman’s comp. welfare (in cash, housing or food stamps) have not had one day of paid vacation, not one day of medical coverage (until S.S. in Jan 08) No repo’s, no default’s, no bad checks or even a late payment.. And having been a contractor (in L.I.N.Y. until 1976, and in Ca. since 77 (DORAN IMPROVEMENTS #331099) without having one single one complaint filed against me! And some of you “may” be thinking; I SHOULD DO WHAT???
DEAR READER, IF THE ONLY THING I RETURN TO IRELAND WITH IS THE SAME $2.00? THAT’S O.K. AS THE $2.00 WILL STILL HAVE THE COMPANY OF MY BEST FRIEND’S; MY ‘TOWNHALLS’ AND MY DIGNITY!!
Go ahead bet the farm on it, NO B*****DS ASS Will ever have my Lip Print on it!
Bringing me to where I am at, and this MOST IMPORTANT REASON’S for requesting intervention by The Irish Embassy/Government!
First off, there is no doubt that The City of Norco and The Riverside Courts have been engaged in violating our rights since 1992, but has gotten especially worse since Sept. 2003 when I started (trying) to write the book! And as outrageous as having our home raided with false warrants (or none at all). And given that I now have TO GET A COURT ORDER stopping the city’s unlawful acts (AN ORDER THAT WILL NOT COME OUT OF A RIVERSIDE COURT, UNLESS THE EMBASSY OR THE NEWS MEDIA POINTS A FINGER, PEN, OR CAMERA AT THEM).
AND NOW I ASK YOU TO PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING CAREFULLY, AS I BELIEVE I’M BEING SET UP BY THE COURTS, WHICH COULD SEE ME IN JAIL; I’LL EXPLAIN.
On two separate occasions The Riverside Court allowed criminal charges to be filed against me; one on Sept. 15, 2006, which was heard on Oct. 3, 2006; and the second was filed Oct. 1, 2009, and was heard on Oct. 16, 2009.
And although both included written charges, with Stalking, Death Threats, invasion of personal privacy and phone records being among them.
(ALL OF WHICH ARE PRISON TERM OFFENCES).
And although I produced documents and gave oral testimony (or, I should say I “tried to give”) that supported my not guilty plea; at the first hearing (before I was even finished speaking/defending) the Judge actually got up and walked off the bench! Need I tell you his “decision”?
And the only difference in the one last Oct. was, in that one the Judge (JUDGE CHRISTIAN THIERBACH) didn’t leave the bench, he just ordered me to stop speaking, and then cited that he was doing as the other Judge had “for good cause” done in Oct. 06 which was finding against me!!
The court transcript of Oct. 09 and 06 are here waiting for your email or fax #.
NOW, IF THERE ARE ANY AMONG YOU WHO ARE READING THIS, WHO CAN COME TO ANY CONCLUSION OTHER THAN THAT I AM A CRIMINAL, AS THE CHARGES FILED AGAINST ME HAD BEEN UPHELD (SO, A MATTER OF PUBLIC RECORD).
JUST ASK YOURSELF, SINCE THE “PRISON TERM” CHARGES WERE FILED AND UPHELD WITHOUT MY BEING ALLOWED TO PRESENT A DEFENSE AND/OR, WHY WAS I NOT CHARGED BY THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY, & MAYBE SENT TO PRISON?
ONE SIMPLE REASON, AND THAT IS… IF THE D.A. FILED THE CHARGE?
I WOULD THEN HAVE HAD TO GET MORANDA RIGHTS READ TO ME, AND THAT WOULD INCLUDE AN ATTORNEY AND A JURY TRIAL. AND IN A FAIR COURT, THE IRREFUTABLE DEFENCE FACTS I’VE GOT WOULD HAVE RESULTED IN THE ACCUSER (not me) BEING CHARGED!
LEAVING ONE CONCLUSION
Since those Saintly Judges know I can’t be frightened off (which means that I’m still planning to expose them) Then the next best bet is to try to discredit me as “A TWICE FOUND GUILTY” CRIMINAL who’s not to be trusted!
LEAVING JUST ONE SOLUTION
If and when the Ca. State Attorney General’s office is contacted.. DEMAND that the Oct. 2006 and Oct. 2009 “RULINGS” be cleared off the record, OR RE-FILE THE CHARGES THROUGH THE D. A. OFFICE!
And as long as you are at it.. You could also demand an answer to the letter I sent to the Riverside D. A….. Re: Possible abuse by D.A. staff. Mar/09 (copies attached).
We as Irish Citizens respectfully send this request for assistance to you Consulate General, as our last best hope to end this nightmare. And I ask you to please understand that when I have a need to appear in an American (or Irish) Council Hall or Courtroom, I do not take it as a right to stand with my pants up (instead of bent over with my pants down) I TAKE IT AS A DUTY TO THE PEOPLE WHO FOUGHT, KILLED, BLED AND DIED FOR ALL OF US… TO LIVE AND (if need be) DIE FOR THAT SAME LIBERTY, JUSTICE AND LIVE FREE UNDER LAW PRINCIPAL!!!
With all due respect,
IF YOU WISH DOWNLOAD THE S.C.D.T. BOOK?
DO IT! CLICK HERE (It’s not for sale) IT’S FREE!!
(Tells it like it is; without the loss of “real” Irish humor)